'Level of processing' model of memory Math Problem

Level of processing model of memory - Math Problem ExampleEysenck tested this model to see if it could explain reported differences between untested and old people in their ability to move back verbal material. Eysenck predicted that there would be an interaction between time and recall condition, more specifically that new(a)er participants would recall more intelligence operations when using deeper levels of processing.30 subjects between 55 and 65 years of epoch, and 30 subjects between 18 and 30 years of age were allocated to one of three groups - two incidental learning groups and one intentional group. Each group was presented with a list of 27 words and their recall was tested later. One group was asked to count the letters in each word one group had to read each word and think of a word that rhymed with it. Neither of these two groups was told that they would later have to recall these words. Finally, the intentional learning group was asked to read through the list a nd memorize it for later recall.The aims of this submit are to investigate whether different learning or age groups have an effect on recall ability and whether there is an interaction between the two groups (age and learning). You must use appropriate ANOVA techniques to investigate and interpret the given information and to complete the tasks given on the following page.From the table above, it is evident that the young are able to recall many words than the old. The young can recall some 11 words with a standard deviation of 6.077 season the old can recall some 8 words with a standard deviation of 2.5. The ability to recall among the young people is a bout varying than the recalling ability of the old people.Table 2 Total number of words recalled per Group Level of processingMeanNStd. Deviation run6.65201.182Rhyming7.00201.170Intentional15.15204.511Total9.60604.809Intentional group has the highest recalling ability than the other groups. Participants in this group can recall 15 words with a standard deviation of 4.5. Rhyming groups recalls 7 words with a standard deviation of 1.1 while counting group recalls 7 words with a standard deviation of 1.2. On variation, the intentional group has the most variations in terms of recalling than the other groups. Table 3 Tests of Between-Subjects Effects tooth rootType III Sum of SquaresdfMean SquareFSig.Corrected Model1254.6005250.920123.403.000Intercept5529.60015529.6002719.475.000AGE112.0671112.06755.115.000GROUP925.3002462.650227.533.000AGE * GROUP217.2332108.61753.418.000Error109.800542.033Total6894.00060Corrected Total1364.40059R Squared = .920 (Adjusted R Squared = .912)both the age and the group are significant in determining the number of words one can recall at 95% level of significance. Further, age and group have significant interaction with each other. Figure 1From figure 1 above, it is evident that the young had the least ability to recall among the counting group than the old age. However, both Rhym ing and intentional had the highest recalling capability than the same groups of old the age. Among the old, both counting and rhyming have the same recalling capacity. Table 4 ANOVA of total number of words recalled per Age Sum of SquaresdfMean SquareFSig.Between Groups112.0671112.067